The Rebel Philosopher's Blog

Exploring experience, perception, and meaning with a fresh, philosophical perspective. Join me as we question norms and embrace new ways of thinking.

When I write about the work that I do in my life, I find myself frequently reminding people that I’m still human. I have good days and bad days just like everybody else. While I know that living life like this isn’t for the faint of heart, I don’t deny the reality of the world I live in either.

I’m not a conspiracy theorist. I don’t follow underground news sources or distrust everything in the mainstream media, including my Canadian government. I accept reality as it is and allow others to create their own. I don’t need to push my viewpoint on others.

Politically, I’m very far left in the belief that everyone should have free access to food, clothing, shelter, education, healthcare, and a universal basic income. At the same time, I support the right of conspiracy theorists to state their reality just as I state mine. If that makes them happy, who am I to argue?

I used to believe that controlling the narrative, enforcing agreement, and creating rules would protect people. Over time, I realized the flaw in that thinking—it creates an endless need for rules. Societies meant to be free become quasi-dictatorships where dissenting thoughts are silenced.

This became obvious to me when the Canadian government started trying to regulate social media. The goal was to protect people from misinformation, but in doing so, they positioned their own beliefs as the only truth. That approach is more harmful than helpful.

When governments try to control information, they don’t eliminate it—they push it underground, often to platforms outside their jurisdiction. That loss of visibility creates an even more harmful environment. What’s worse: knowing what people believe, even if it’s false, or being completely unaware of the conversations happening in the shadows? Trying to suppress ideas only fuels distrust and division.

Allowing open discussion is better than attempting to regulate it. It creates space for response and debate—things that aren’t possible if people are afraid to speak. The left has embodied a “cancel culture” mentality, regulating and shutting down unwanted narratives. This only deepens division, fostering resentment and distrust between differing realities.

It took me a long time to become comfortable voicing these thoughts because they challenge the prevailing ideology. Social media gave everyone a platform, yet now we’re seeing efforts to control what can be said. Years ago, I predicted that regulating social media would push platforms to shift left and right depending on political power. That’s exactly what happened.

Meta (Facebook), owned by Mark Zuckerberg, has aligned itself with the political right. Why? Because for big companies like Meta, Google, and Amazon, compliance with government expectations is a strategic business move. It’s how they prevent excessive government interference.

Many people argue that these corporations should take a moral stand, but those same people wouldn’t risk their own jobs over policies they dislike. Why should a business be expected to self-destruct over shifting political landscapes?

This is what happens when the left tries to control the narrative. If we allowed open discussion instead of attempting to regulate it, social media companies would naturally find a balance. Left alone, they would still filter out the most harmful content. But when forced, they react unpredictably, swinging from side to side with each election cycle. Force always creates imbalance.

I started this blog reflecting on my own balance—how my beliefs shape my life and how I constantly navigate my thoughts. But as I wrote, I found myself discussing free speech on social media. And maybe that’s the point. The struggle for balance within myself mirrors the struggle I see in the world around me.

To put it bluntly, even with all the spiritual and philosophical tools I have, finding balance is still hard. Some days it works, and some days it doesn’t. Politics aside, grace and acceptance matter. It’s okay to mess up. It’s okay to be human. It’s okay to not have all the answers.

The key is avoiding rash decisions and overreactions. We have a tendency to want to shut things down, erase them, or run from them. But if we step back, observe, and question our beliefs, we can find hidden balance and truth in every moment.

I will never claim that my process is easy or perfect. What I will say is that if you have the courage, the will to change, and the desire for self-awareness, balance is always available—no matter how chaotic the world appears.

Balance is a choice, not a condition. Managing your internal world is the path to it, which brings me back to self-mastery. True freedom comes from learning to manage your thoughts, feelings, and actions without trying to control the external experience. It means taking full responsibility for yourself. Some days it’s effortless; other days, it takes work. Right now, I’m having to try a little harder—but that’s okay. I have the skills to handle it, and I know I can find my balance whenever I need to.

Love to all.

Della

Discuss...

I came upon a familiar choice today: stay or go. Continue on the path or drop it and move on to the next thing? I chose to stay.

Traditionally, this question has frustrated me. Every time it’s come up, it’s brought an existential crisis. If I’m confronted with the choice, then it must be time to leave, otherwise, I wouldn’t be offered the choice. But is that story true?

Read more...

Boundaries are self-protection. If you’re keeping people in your life that you think treat you poorly, you’re making a choice to do that. If you decide that you no longer want that in your life, then you’re making a choice to end or limit those relationships. Both of those are choices and neither of them have anything to do with boundaries.

Read more...

Don’t get me wrong with this blog, I love all holidays, including Valentine’s Day. However, there is a lot of obligation that goes into these kinds of holidays. People seem to feel compelled, obligated, and forced into celebrating or acknowledging holidays that are painful, sad, or upsetting in some kind of way. Let’s see if we can break through the guilt once and for all.

Holidays are human rules. They are just things we tell other people we’re doing. Have you seen the meme’s on social media that end with, “ We’re doing this thing. Tell the others…”? That’s exactly what holidays are. Days that we’ve agreed upon, named, and decided what activities should be done on that day.

Valentine’s Day is typically designed for couples. But what if you’re not in a relationship? What if everyday is Valentine’s Day? What if you’re rebelling against love? What if you just see it as a capitalist holiday?

Then I say, don’t celebrate it and don’t feel guilty about it either. You’re not obligated to celebrate the holiday. You’re not obligated to do anything. If you don’t want to do it, don’t do it. Just remember not to be defensive about it.

It’s okay to not celebrate, but we don’t have to defend that. We don’t have to tout it as some rebel move. We don’t have to knock the holiday or wreck it for others. It’s just a choice you’re making. There is nothing wrong that choice. You don’t have to feel guilty about it at all.

What defending it says is that you’re not yet fully owning it. It’s like society makes you come up with an excuse or something to blame in order to simply honor your own choices. What would happen if you just decided for yourself without the blame or the story?

Standing in your own choices isn’t always easy. People, especially on social media, are likely to question what you’re doing and why you’re doing it. If you can learn to answer those questions without being defensive by simply owning the choice, then you’re most of the way out of the guilt already.

It’s the guilt that makes you feel the need to defend. You’re not really free from it if you’re still feeling the guilt and having to defend your choice. If you didn’t feel guilty or feel like you were doing something wrong, you probably wouldn’t even bother to defend yourself. You wouldn’t even tell people what you were doing or not doing in this case.

We have this thing where we like to tell people that we’re going against the grain. I’ve done it too in the past. I guess technically I do it every day now, but it’s different. I’m not defending anything but I am questioning everything. That’s what I want you to do, question why you feel guilty for making a choice. Question why you feel the need to defend the choice?

It doesn’t matter what the holiday is that you’re not participating in or what the thing is you’ve decided to do or not do, it’s okay to make that choice. It’s okay to stand in your power.

Where does the guilt come from? It’s learned. We’ve all been taught to feel bad for rebelling against the human rules. It’s a way to keep everybody in line and doing the same thing. You get called a “party pooper” when you don’t celebrate certain things. But you’re not. You’ve just decided to do something differently and that’s okay. The guilt is learned, which means it’s not yours to begin with. You picked it up from somewhere.

There are so many things that we feel that were taught to us. They aren’t ours. Those wounds your parents and caregivers passed onto you weren’t yours either. But here you are owning them like a champ. We were trained to feel that way and one of them is the guilt around not celebrating a given holiday.

The thing is, you’re not free of it until you’re able to release the guilt. If you’re stuck in a cycle of feeling guilty and defending yourself every Valentine’s Day you’re not really free yet, are you? Let go of the need to do this stuff. Just drop it. It’s not yours anyway. If other people try to pass it onto you, just let it go. Trying owning the choice without the defensiveness and see how that goes.

You don’t have to be flippant or rude or defiant. Just compassionately, kindly own the choice and allow people to believe or think whatever they will about your choice. It’s not your job to convince anybody of anything, or even to convince them that you’re allowed to make the choice. Just make it and don’t worry about what other people think of it.

You don’t need permission. You don’t need approval. You just need to choose.

What choices in your life are still tied to guilt? And what happens if you simply let that go?

Let me know in the comments below!

If you know somebody that’s struggling with Valentine’s Day, share this blog with them. If you subscribe to the blog via email, you’ll be notified every time I put something here! Thanks for your support!

Love to all.

Della

P.S. I put a new short read e-book in my shop (library) called The Power of Choice. Go grab a copy. It’ll help you make choices and stand in them, without blame or self-defense. Here’s the link: https://therebellibrary.dellawren.com/b/the-power-of-choice

P.P.S. I also have an article up on Substack called, “Why Do No Harm Take No Shit Misses the Mark”. Check it out and subscribe at this link: https://therebellioninsider.substack.com/p/why-do-no-harm-take-no-shit-misses

Discuss...

Life can feel like a constant struggle. There is always a problem to solve, something that’s not working out the way you had hoped, or some scary choice you have to make. Welcome to the struggle bus!

The struggle bus is a place we’re all familiar with. We end up there every time we feel like we have to fight with the outside world to get what we want. Every time we engage in arguing with the outside world to change itself, particularly trying to change things that are out of our control, we board the struggle bus. Padded seats for the win!

Read more...

Love and hate are human constructs. So are good and bad, right and wrong, left and right, up and down. Even time is a human construct created through our perception of reality.

If those are all human constructs and all experience is otherwise neutral, then how is experience created? Where does the idea of balance come from?

Read more...

Life is absurd. Do you agree?

In philosophical terms the absurd is a concept that was popularized by Albert Camus. The absurd, as Camus sees it, is the conflict between a human beings’ desire for meaning and the indifferent, rather meaningless universe we live in.

The question of whether or not that’s a conflict is an interesting one to explore. Is it really a conflict? Or are we simply here to create the meaning for ourselves?

Read more...

My own viewpoints have felt extreme to me for a while now. It’s something I’ve been struggling with because I’ve been unsure about what to do with them. To be honest, the more the world starts to blow up, the more far out there I begin to feel. I’ve been missing for the last couple of weeks because it started to catch up to me and I had to make myself sit with it to figure it out. Procrastination is very real and it’s also a great self-defense mechanism that keeps you stuck for a long time if you let it. Just saying… I know somebody who’s had this experience lately, namely me! ;)

Read more...

The Trolley Problem is a psychological or philosophical moral debate. A trolley is coming down a track and you see that it is set to hit 5 people that are unable to move. There is a lever available to pull that would send the trolley down a different track where only one person would be hit. What do you do?

Read more...

Yep! She’s going to sing at the inauguration. Every time we have an inauguration somebody is complaining about who is showing up to perform. When a Democratic president is being inaugurated, the Republicans go unfollow those musicians. Now that a particularly divisive Republican president is being inaugurated, Carrie Underwood is getting her fair share of pushback and unfollows for wanting to perform at an inauguration.

Read more...

Enter your email to subscribe to updates.